范文一:嗜酸性粒细胞和嗜碱性粒细胞计数
(一)嗜酸性粒细胞计数 嗜酸性粒细胞参与Ⅰ型变态反应,因此嗜酸性粒细胞增多可作为Ⅰ型变态反应的辅助诊断指标,而且可作为疗效判定的指标之一。 嗜酸性粒细胞计数可用白细胞分类计数法,也可以用直接计数法,目前多采用后者。该类细胞的胞浆颗粒中富含碱性氨基酸和碱性蛋白,其等电点为pH11,因此呈嗜酸性,易与阴离子结合而被染色。常用的染色液含伊红、石炭酸和福尔马林,该溶液可溶解红细胞和其他白细胞,增加背景的清晰度,使嗜酸性粒细胞易于识别。 (二)嗜碱性粒细胞计数 嗜碱性粒细胞亦参与Ⅰ型变态反应,其计数方法主要是直接计数法。嗜碱性粒细胞胞浆颗粒中肝素的硫酸根容易与阳离子染料结合而着色,现在常用的酸性染色液包括0.1%EDTA、阿利新蓝、氯代十六烷基吡啶和氯化镧等。该染液能使红细胞和其他白细胞溶解,使嗜酸性粒细胞易于区别。 外周血嗜碱性粒细胞数大于33/mm3判为增高,大于50/mm3为显著增高。本试验可作为Ⅰ型变态反应的筛选试验,阳性率可达60%~70%;而且可作为疗效考查的辅助指标。
范文二:嗜碱性粒细胞激发试验的临床应用
山东医 2 0 1 药4 第年 5 卷4第 3
嗜期性粒碱胞细激试验发 的临应用床
晓朱敏 , 张 云慧 ,何衡
韶
(南京1医 科 大第一学附 属医 院, 京 2南 0 1 209 ;2 苏 州市城人 相 民医 院 ;3 海 南学医 )院 摘要 : 目的
观 察 碱性嗜粒细胞 激发验试( B T A) 临的应床用况情, 过为疾 敏的诊病提断供参 。考方法 选 择
1
0种人吸性过敏原 3对 例过0性敏 病 疾者患行 敏原过体外 异性 B 特 TA, 福克全 自动 过原敏定量分析 系 统测 患者检 清血特异性 I g (E s lgE ) 水 平 对 B 。 TA与s l g检测E结果 进 一 致性行 验 。结果检 被检 1 0过种敏原 ,中马上皮 、 格链 孢 属 、孢枝霉属 菌 、蒿 艾、 桦白及梯牧 草树B A T的 性 阳检出 率明高显于清血 sl g 检测 E P,
断过诊敏刚才刚步 ,起 对中 人国群 的诊疗值还价 需 量临床大 验数试据临床跟踪 和资料才能进一 评 步价 。
我 实 验 室自 20 1 0年6 月 引进H i ts a r ead e r 5 0 1 统系 ,该 检测 系统 对 敏 原过的 检测 方 法 我与 目们 传前 使统用 通过的体外 定性 、 半定 量、 定 检量测患 血 者 清特 异性 I g 水E平 方法 完全 同不 过 。敏反 的应 应效 段是阶由于 体 人肥内 大 细胞 过 敏 原激 被活 后, 引 起肥 大细 胞脱 颗粒, 释 放出 肥大细胞 特 异 类性胰 蛋白
0 . 7
5一 性较好。P ≤致O 0.5 为异有差计统意学 义 。
2 结 果
B AT 果结示显 ,屋 尘螨 、 粉尘螨 、链 孢格及属
枝 孢属霉 菌 过 敏原检 出 性阳 在 2率5 % 以 上; 过 敏 原s Ig E检测 结果 显示 仅,屋尘 螨 、 尘 粉 阳性 螨率 高 达
0 %5 和4 6. %,7 余其敏过原 性检 阳率出均在6 . 7% 以 下; 上述 两种 法 方 测 结检 阳果 吻合性 率最 的高 过 敏原屋尘是和粉尘螨 螨 分别 , 1 为 %和 173 , 其余% 过
敏阳性 吻合原均率低于 %,7上述 种方两检法测 屋 螨 、尘粉 尘 螨 过 原敏 性阴 合吻率 均 为 3 7 ,% 而其 他 过敏 原
阴性 合率吻 均 在 36% 以上 ; 两种检 测方法
酶组和胺生物活等性介质, 引起 滑平肌收缩, 毛细 血
管扩张 通 透,性 加 等 , 而增产生 一的系列 敏过症 。状
对过原检敏测整体 的阳性率分为别2 3 %、 12 . 2% ,
P< 0 . 05 两; 检测 种法方对 0种1过 敏原的 测检 结
果B
TA检原测是理在外体模拟 体 内过敏了反应 的 过程 ,即 过用敏激原发者患血 中全嗜性粒细碱胞, 引
嗜起 碱性粒细 胞 颗 脱 粒,组 胺释放 , 释对 放组 胺的进行 9
山 东医 2药 104 第年 54卷第 3 期 测 定 ,确 定 患 是 否者 对某 过 种敏 物 质过 。敏 清 血 I sgE检 测 目前是对 IgE介 导 的过 敏 反应 用运最 广 泛
[ 3 ]Ga v rey L , KHr o i g aar d M, P o u ls en L K, e t 1 .I a Eg— m e di t e d aal l e r gy t o hcl o r h e i d ixn e J [ ]. l l Ae r
y gC l iu I m m nu ol, 2 0 0 ,7 1 20( )2 4:0 9-
4 51 .
的辅助
断诊法 方, 点缺对小分是过子原诱敏发的过 敏 反应几 乎无 测 意 检 J义 。 本 研 对究 1种 吸 人O性
敏过原用上述 种两检 测 系统检测 , 结 果二者 致 一 性 较差 ,原 是因 种两 检测 系统检 原测理 不导同致 测
检[
4 M ]e e r HyW , t S ha S klo v P.Oc c up ati on a l r hi n s i on us it i s d ue t o teo —
p
so die ,a n a n t nie op l sat i e a ge n [tJ .] c aSn d J W or Ek n v r o n i
e lt H a ,h 02 1 0, 3 6 3() : 26 - 6 2 6 7.
[5 ] Eb o D G , B r i dt s HC,H a eg n do r e n s M M , t e1 .aBa s o ph i l a t ci a v ti on
ets t yb l fo w c yto me t ry: rp see tn and f ut u er a p p li ac ti on s i n a l l r e ogl o —
结不具相关果性B A T。阳性, 说 明该者患过是因 敏 被检过 敏原/ 过 源敏 活被检 患者激的嗜 碱性 细胞 粒 ,即过
敏应反的核 心效 应细 胞 ( 碱嗜性 粒胞细和 肥 大 胞 )细 之一 所 致“ J , 而 此 嗜 碱性粒 胞细被激 活
的g [y J] . C yto m e tr y B C i n l C y to m , 20 8 0, 7 4 ( 4 : 2) 01- 21 0 .[ 6
L]o ur en co DFA,z ro MH ,Sa nt o s J C e,t a 1. A t ci vat e d ts a t us o f b a
s- o p h i l is n c hr o i u r i tc r i aa l e a d s t oi n t e lre u kin - - 3 h y p e r r es p o n si v e - - ens s an d e n ha n c eme t nof h i s t aimn e r l e ae es i n u d e cd b y a n t i I— E g
过程可
能是I g E或 者Ig G介导 的 ¨ , 亦能可是分小 子直接活化式¨方3 1 H
J 或,联合者作用。于过敏对
原上马皮 ,格 链属 孢 枝、 属孢 菌霉, 艾 蒿, 白树 及梯桦牧
s
t i mul u s J[ ]. Br J D e r m a t lo , 0 0 8 2 ,1 5 ( 5 ) :89 7 9 -98 6 . [ 7B o] hm I S,p e ck U, S c h i l d HH.Pi l t os tu dy o n b sao ph i l cat v ait i o n
i
nd c e du ub c o n rta s m et di mu [J] . Fu n d m C a li nPh ra a c o l , m20 1 1 , 2 5
2() : 2 6 7- 2 7 6 .
草B A T 阳性检 率明显高出于 sI g检测E, 能可是由 于这 些过 敏原 对 者患产 生 的 过 敏反应 为 非 g I 介 导 E
, 故s 的I g 检E 试 验测检 测 到不, 而 这 两者 间 差的 异 有很可 能 映 了反I g G 介 的差异导 这,说 明B TA 比
[ 8 ] G o n az l z ede O l an o D , A v a r el z Two s e , MIo rg ad o J M e,t a 1 . E v a ul -a
i t n o o f b a o s p i lh a c i vta t oin i n ma s t coy t o s i s wi t h yH em o npt rea v e n o
m
a na p h y alx i[ Js ]C. y ot e tmr y B Cl i nC y to ,2 m0 1 , 18 0 3)( :1 6 7 -
1 7 . 5
s l E检测对g敏原过的测范检围 宽泛 更, B TA不仅能 帮助
诊 s断 I E阳性g过敏 , 亦可有 能 对s g El检 测结果
[
] R 9 n a u led V ,G o u d t e V , o u t M on F iav r e C , e t a1 . C sa e r e p o tr: p e f oi—
p r eat iv e i me md ia t e h yp er s ens t i i i v yt i nv o vl se on l y a ll r eg y b u tsla o
a ms t toc ty s oi [s ]J.C a n J A nae ts h, 2 01 1 5 ,8 5 )( : 45 6 4 - 5 .9
阴
性非 I 即gE 导的过敏诊断有介助。帮sI g E升高 只 代表能患者 内的一体状态种, 并
不代患表者一对
该定物 质产生过 反敏应 ,s即l g 升高 E 过与 敏反应之 间
[ 1 ] F l0a c o ne H,FZ i l il ek n s D ,Gi b b s B . F Th e 2 1 st ce n u t yr e r n a i s s n c e a
of t eh ba so ph i ?Clu r er tn i sni g h t s i tno i t sr o l e i n all e r g i c r e sp o sn se
a
d ni n n a t e i mmun i yt[J ]E.x p D r emat o l2, 0 60, 1 5( 1 1 ):8 55 —
86 4 .
无必联然系。 BAT 结合 s l g E检测 , 对s gl E高升者 的患过敏应 反可以 明 确 为 I E依g赖 , 而 引 该起患 者 s Ig E高升 过、敏状和症征体的物质即 为过原,敏为 患的特异性脱者敏疗治提 了重供要依据¨ B。 TA
结合s g EI检 ,测 结 均 果 阴为 性 者 ,可 认 以为 该物 质 不 引起是患者 过反 应敏的 敏过原 。 综
上述 , B 所 A对过T敏原 的检 测 范 围比s l g E 检
[
1 1K ] no l F .ER e q u i e r me t n s f o re fe c t i v e I g E cr o s — lsi nk i g n on m ast ce l l s
an d b a s o ph l i[s ]J. Mo l uN t r o F o R eds , 2 0 0 ,6 50( ) : 67 2  ̄204
. [12 W] oo l h is er M ,RB or c k o w ,KM e tca l fe D D.A c i t a v t i no o f h u m an
ums t c e l l s by a gg re g ate dI g tGh r o ug F ch g ama mRI: ad d tii ve e f ec t s
o f C 3a[ ]J C l. i n Immu n o l , 2 0 40,1 1 ( 0 )2: 17 —21 8 .0 [ 1 ]S h 3 ee n HC, cSh l e im er R P, u Klk a M. Cod e in ei nd u e e sh u m a n a mst c e
l l c h emok ni end a c yt o k i ne p r odu ct io n :i n
v ol ve me n t o f G —p ro t e i
na
c it va t i o[ Jn ]A. ll er , gy 020 7 , 6 ( 25 ): 5 2 3-5 8 3. [ 1 ]4G ib s b B, F lPa t h K E , oWl HfHe, t 1 .R ae gu la t i o n of med i tao rs e—
c e t i ron i n h u a m nb sao p hi ls b y p 38 mi t o g n e—a c itv a etd p otr ei n k i n ase :
p hos p h or y l a t i no i s s e n s i t v i e t o th e ef e c t s o f p h s o h pa ti y l din os i t ol 3-
测更宽 泛, 其 不能仅帮助诊 s断I g 阳性E过 敏 , 亦有 可能对 s lg 检测结果阴性E非 即 g I介导E的敏过
诊断有 帮助 。 参 文考 :
[献1 H] e S ,Z h an g ,H Z eng X,e t a 1 . S le f- am lp ii fc a tio n m e c ha n i s m s of m as t ce l l a ct vi tai o :an n w e loo k i n a l l reg y[ J ] .C u r r M ol Me d , 2
0 12 1 , 2 1(0 :) 31 9 -21 33 9 .
k i n as e i n hib ito m nd a c a l ic u m m o b i l i az tio n [ J].J L e u k o e B io l, 2
0 0 , 2 27( ) 2:3 9 1- 4 0 0.
1[ 5]G e rne z ,YT i r uo v n az im a ,YR u Ge ,t a 1 . a Bso h ipl C D 2 03 l cev e s l
are i n cre a s de at ba se l i n e a n d c a n b u e e s t mo o in t or o na l i z u ma b
[ 2 何韶衡 . 以过]性疾敏发病病制机为基浅础其析助辅断诊段及 临手意床[义 J ] .华中临床 免疫和 变态 反杂应 志,2 0 1 1, 5 (1 :) 一 1
t
r aet m e n t i ns u b j e tc s i t wh nu t l la e ry
[g J] I n. t Ar h c A l l e ry g I mmu —
n 1 o, 2 0 1 , 1 1 5 4 () 4: 3 81 - 32 7 .
(
收稿 期日 2:0 1 3 — 1 0 0 6 - )
1 0
范文三:嗜碱性粒细胞增强记忆性免疫应答
中国肿瘤生物治疗杂志,2008年8月,15(4)
[22]ChungEJ,Sung
analysis
in
human
YK,Farooq
M,et
a1.Gene
by
expressioneDNA
profile
[28]Stoff-Khalili
MA,Rivera
a
AA,Nedeljkovic—Kurepa
A,eta1.Can?
using
hepatocellularcarcinoma
microarray
cer?specifictargetingofmRNA
translational
conditionallyreplieativeadenovirus
CancerRes
[J].MolCells,2002,14(3):382-387.
[23]Bauer
C。DiesingerI,BrassN,et
a1.Translationinitiation
amplified
in
factor
control[J].Breast
Treat,2008,
108(1):43-55.
elF-4Giswith
immunogenic,overexpressed,and
lung
patients
[29]Bymes
K,LiBD,HolmN,et
a1.Anove|suicidegene
therapy
im—
squamouscellcarcinoma[J].Cancer,2001,92(4):targetingtheoverexpressionofeukaryoti,’initiationin
a
factor4E
822—829.
provessurvival
eu—
rat
i,eriloneal
carcinomatosis
model[J].Sur-
[24]Ramya
karyotic
TN,SuroliaN,SuroliaA.15-DeoxyspergualininhibitsproteinsynthesisthroughelF2
Mpha
gery,2ff07,142(2):270-275.
phosphorylation[J].[30]ChuQD.Sun
with
an
L,LiJ,et
a1.Ratadenocarcinnmacell
a
lineinfected
Bi,x:hem
J.2007。401(2):411-420.
Y,DeBenedettiA.Selectivekillingof
a
adenoviros
suicidegene
canting
novel
herpes?-simplexvirus—?thymidine
[25]DeFattaBJ,Li
based
on
cancercellsGene
kinaseconstructdiesbyapoptosisupontreatmentwith
translationalc,onlrolofsuicide
gene[J].Cancer
ganciclovir[J].J[31]Cre’ancier
Surg
Res,2007,143(1):189—194.
a1.Fibroblast
ex
Ther,2002,9(7):573-578.L,MorelloD,MercierP,et
growthfactor
trans—
[26]DeFattaRJ,Chervenak
PY
approach
through
RP,DeBenedetti
A.Aof
a
cancer
genethera?
2internalribomme
a
entrysite(IRES)activity
vivoandin
translational(?ontrolsuicide
gene[J].geniemicereveals
stringenttissue—specific
regulation[Jj.J
Cell
CancerGeue
Ther,2002,9(6):505-512.
DA,eta1.Cancer—spel?ific
targe一
ki一
Biol,2000,150(1):275-281.
[27]MathisJM,WilliamsBJ.Sibley
tingot’anadenovirusdeliveredherpessimplexvirus
nase
thymidineGene
[收稿日期】2008一06一03[本文编辑]韩丹
[修回日期]2008-07—20
suicide
gene
using
translational
control[J].J
Med,
2006,8(9):1105—1120.
气e^心,譬。气C代C气C噶e噶吐水气心^心^—,掣!气e1心“矗,口e气C‘℃^心^心^瑶,皆巳t4乍e乍elel啦"F’窜。气c1≈1心/90t也々e气汜^心“罐’譬e气世^也乍eGcl世1心,90
?科技动态?
嗜碱性粒细胞增强记忆性免疫应答
近年来,人们对嗜碱性粒细胞免疫功能的认识逐渐加深。来自德国雷根斯馒大学医院的Mack等学者在2008年7月的
Nature
Immunology杂志上发表的文章表明,再次免疫应答过程中的嗜碱性粒细胞能通过表面IgE结合抗原并通过分泌IL-4和
IL-6等细胞因子增强记忆性B细胞免疫应答。
嗜碱性粒细胞足一种数量很少的粒细胞,在人和小鼠的外周血白细胞中的比例为1%以下。以往对该细胞的研究卡要集中在致敏原和某些寄生虫感染引发的过敏反应,对其免疫调节功能了解很少。现自.研究表明,嗜碱性粒细胞可通过表面高亲和力的IgE受体FceRl结合初次应答中产牛的抗原特异性IgE,当相同抗原冉次进入机体后,结合了lgE的嗜碱性粒细胞就能通过表面结合的lgE迅速结合抗原并活化,产生大量lL4和II。_6。上述两种细胞闪子具有促进体液免疫应答的作用。因此,作者推测嗜碱性粒细胞在再次免疫应答中的活化町能促进记忆性B细胞体液免疫应答的作用。
实验首先采用了别藻蓝蛋白(APC)作为抗原免疫小鼠,数周后用APC进行再刺激,发现免疫后的小鼠体内长期存在能够通过表面IgE结合APC的嗜碱性粒细胞。再次应答中该群嗜碱性粒细胞结合APC抗原后能够迅速活化并成为脾脏和骨髓细胞中IL-4和IL-6的主要分泌细胞。嗜碱性粒细胞的这一活化过程依赖Fc受体^y链。再次应答前采用抗体腹腔注射清除体内嗜碱性粒细胞后,再次应答所产生的抗原特异性IgGl和lgG2a分别减少50%和60%一80%,同时抗原特异性B细胞和浆细胞数也显著下降。如果将经过免疫的小鼠脾脏或骨髓细胞去除浆细胞后过继到未经免疫的小鼠体内,该受体小鼠在APC抗原刺激下可产生一定水平的特异性抗体;如果将脾脏或骨髓细胞中的嗜碱性粒细胞清除后再进行过继,则受体小鼠在APC刺激下产生的特异性抗体显著减少。作者通过体外实验发现,在活化的C1MT细胞存在下,活化的嗜碱性粒细胞能够促进B细胞增殖,并分泌IgG和IgM抗体。此外,嗜碱性粒细胞通过分泌IL-6促进活化的CD4T细胞分泌IL-4、IL-5、IL一10、IL一13,促进其表达Gata3,下调IFN一1和IL-2表达,成为促进体液免疫应答的Th2。
该研究表明,嗜碱性粒细胞除r在某些过敏反应中发挥重要作用外,还可能具有很多以前没有认识到的功能,有待进一步的探索。
[姚雨石摘译,郭振红审阅.Denzel
A,MausUA,RodriguezGomezM,eta1.Nat
Immunol,2008,9(7):733-742]
万方数据
范文四:调节人嗜碱性粒细胞脱颗粒
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262189657 Modulation Of Human Basophil Degranulation By Geranylgeranyl Compounds
Article in Allergology International · May 2014
DOI: 10.2332/allergolint.13-LE-0637 · Source: PubMed
CITATIONS 0 READS 14
7 authors
, including:
Masao Yamaguchi
Teikyo University
135 PUBLICATIONS 4,204 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE Hiroyuki Nagase
Teikyo University
114 PUBLICATIONS 1,654 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Ken Ohta
National Hospital Organization Tokyo Nation…
350 PUBLICATIONS 8,606 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Hiroyuki Nagase on 25 August 2015.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.
Allergology International Vol 63, Suppl 1, 2014www.jsaweb.jp !
49
Dear Editor
Modulation of Human Basophil Degranulation by Geranylgeranyl
Compounds
Recent experimental studies have shown that the ba-sophil is critical for a subtype of anaphylaxis or IgE-mediated very late-phase skin inflammation. 1Motility and activation of basophils are known to be regulated by various endogenous and ! or exogenous sub-stances. The panel of known such basophil-directed molecules is expanding. One important candidate may be geranylgeranyl compounds, which were in-itially demonstrated to be protectors of the gastric mucosa. 2These compounds have also demonstrated protective actions in situations that are often hazard-ous to the host. In rodent studies, geranylgeranylace-tone (GGA)suppressed the development of several inflammatory reactions and enhanced tissue regen-eration in vivo . 2,3However, the effects of GGA on al-lergic effectors and immunologic reactions have not been fully clarified.
In this study, we assessed the pharmacological ac-tions of GGA and related compounds on basophil de-granulation, detected as release of histamine. Baso-phils were obtained from non allergic volunteers by dextran sedimentation of whole blood. Cells were preincubated with GGA (Wako Pure Chemicals, Osaka, Japan) for 15min at 37 , washed and then stimulated with a secretagogue for 45min. 4
Degranulation of basophils by polyclonal anti-IgE antibody (MBL, Nagoya, Japan ) and by phorbol myristate acetate (PMA ) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was significantly enhanced by preincubation of cells for 15min with GGA at 1.4or 2.7mM (Fig.1a). Similar results were observed for highly pure baso-phils (purity>95%;prepared by Percoll gradient cen-trifugation followed by negative MACS selection), in-dicating that GGA acts directly on basophils. On the other hand, GGA showed no clear effect on basophil degranulation by a chemokine, monocyte chemoat-tractant protein (MCP)-1or Ca ionophore A23187. As shown in Figure 1b, up to 15min of incubation of ba-sophils with GGA alone at 2.7mM did not induce re-lease of histamine. However, 30min or longer incuba-tion resulted in higher, 15to 20%histamine release, suggesting that GGA at this concentration might damage basophils in a time-dependent manner. The extent of enhancement of IgE-mediated basophil de-granulation by GGA was mild compared to that by IL-3, and GGA did not show additive augmentation of histamine release by IL-3-treated basophils (Fig.1c). As shown in Figure 1d, another geranylgeranyl com-pound, geranylgeraniol (Sigma),also upregulated ba-sophil histamine release evoked by anti-IgE antibody
or PMA. On the other hand, compounds having
smaller structures, such as geranylacetone and farne-sol, showed no effect on basophil degranulation (datanot shown). Statins inhibit intracellular geranylger-anylation, resulting in suppression of the activation profiles of inflammatory cells, 5-7and basophil de-granulation in response to anti-IgE antibody or PMA was significantly suppressed by preincubation with simvastatin at 50μM(Fig.1e).
Geranylgeranyl compounds are reported to be in-volved in intracellular signal cascades in various cells, including mast cell activation evoked by IgE crosslinkage. 5-7Our present finding that exogenously added GGA can enhance basophil activation suggests that GGA enters basophils and then behaves as a sub-strate in the cell activation pathway. Simvastatin, which can inhibit intracellular geranylgeranylation, suppressed basophil degranulation triggered by anti-IgE antibody and PMA, but not A23187. This finding coincides with our results that GGA augmented baso-phil degranulation evoked by anti-IgE antibody and PMA, but not A23187or MCP-1, suggesting that pro-tein kinase C or related molecule(s)may be the tar-get of GGA. It appears that geranyl and farnesyl com-pounds are not involved in the above pathway in ba-sophils.
GGA’s various novel actions are being unveiled through recent experimental approaches. Mostly based on murine studies, this compound is able to suppress vicious inflammatory disorders of the skin or visceral organs, including pulmonary inflammation induced by gefitinib, an inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor-mediated signals. 3It is thought that one of main in vivo effects of GGA is induction of tissue-stabilizing heat shock proteins. 2,3In vivo stud-ies have so far tested GGA at μMto mM concentra-tions and have found increases in those proteins and changes in cell fate. 8,9Our present findings suggest that GGA at relatively high concentrations can also exert acute effects on cellular functions and enhance the activation of basophils evoked by certain secre-tagogues. Although the in vivo significance of our findings and the whole aspect of the biologic actions of GGA remain unclear, elucidation of the precise roles of this compound in allergies and other tissue-damaging disorders is of special interest in light of its characteristic host-protecting properties.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank Ms. Sayaka Igarashi for her excel-lent technical help.
Yuko Nakase 1, Masao Yamaguchi 1, Naoya Sugimoto 1, Maho Suzukawa 2,
Hidenori Arai 1, Hiroyuki Nagase 1and Ken Ohta 1,2
Allergology International. 2014;63(Suppl1):49-51
DOI:10.2332! allergolint.13-LE-0637
Nakase Y et al.
50
Allergology International Vol 63, Suppl 1, 2014www.jsaweb.jp !
Fi g . 1 Mod u lation of b asophil histamine release b y geranylgeranyl and related compou nds. (a ) Basophil preparations w ere preinc ub ated w ith and w itho u t GGA and then stimu lated w ith variou s secretagogu es. GGA at 1.4 and 2.7 mM corresponds to 0.5 and 1 μl/ml, respectively. Histamine release w as expressed as a percentage of the total cellu lar histamine after sub tracting spontaneo u s release (u s u ally <5%). data="" are="" the="" mean="" ±="" sem="" of="" three="" to="" six="" separate="" experiments.="" *p="" ≤="" 0.05,="" versu="" s="" corre-sponding="" valu="" es="" of="" cells="" not="" preincub="" ated="" w="" ith="" gga.="" (b="" )="" baseline="" histamine="" release="" b="" y="" b="" asophils="" after="" treatment="" w="" ith="" gga.="" cells="" w="" ere="" preincub="" ated="" w="" ith="" gga="" at="" 1="" μl/ml="" for="" the="" indicated="" times,="" w="" ashed="" and="" then="" incub="" ated="" w="" itho="" u="" t="" any="" secretagogu="" e="" for="" 45="" min.="" data="" show="" n="" are="" representative="" of="" three="" separate="" experiments="" that="" generated="" similar="" resu="" lts.="" (c="" )="" priming="" effects="" of="" gga="" and="" il-3="" on="" b="" asophil="" degranu="" lation.="" cells="" w="" ere="" preincub="" ated="" w="" ith="" and="" w="" itho="" u="" t="" gga="" for="" 15="" min,="" w="" ashed="" and="" then="" incub="" ated="" w="" ith="" and="" w="" itho="" u="" t="" il-3="" b="" efore="" stimu="" lation="" w="" ith="" anti-ige="" antib="" ody.="" data="" are="" the="" mean="" ±="" sem="" (n="3)." *p="">5%).>< 0.05="" versu="" s="" corresponding="" val="" u="" e="" of="" cells="" not="" preincub="" ated="" w="" ith="" gga.="" p="">< 0.05="" versu="" s="" corresponding="" valu="" e="" of="" il-3-u="" ntreated="" cells.="" (d="" )="" effect="" of="" geranyl-geraniol="" on="" b="" asophil="" histamine="" release.="" the="" indicated="" concentration="" of="" this="" compou="" nd="" (0.5="" μl/ml,="" 1.5="" mm)="" did="" not="" indu="" ce="" non-specifi="" c="" histamine="" release.="" data="" are="" the="" mean="" ±="" sem="" (n="3)." *p="">< 0.05="" versu="" s="" corresponding="" valu="" e="" of="" cells="" not="" preincub="" ated="" w="" ith="" geranylgeraniol.="" (e="" )="" simvastatin="" su="" ppressed="" b="" asophil="" degranu="" lation.="" basophils="" w="" ere="" preincub="" ated="" w="" ith="" and="" w="" itho="" u="" t="" simvas-tatin="" for="" 15="" min="" at="" 37?c,="" w="" ashed="" and="" then="" stimu="" lated="" w="" ith="" anti-ige="" antib="" ody="" or="" pma="" for="" 45="" min.="" data="" are="" the="" mean="" ±="" sem="" (n="4)." *p="">< 0.05,="" versu="" s="" corresponding="" valu="" e="" of="" cells="" u="" ntreated="" w="" ith="">
100
a 80
6040200
10080604020
GGA (mM) - 2.7 - 2.7 IL-3 (pM) - - 300 300 a nti-IgE (Pg/ml) 1.4 14
1.4 14
1.4 14 1.4 14
1.414401000.10.210100PMA (ng/ml)
Pretreatment with GGAGGA (-)
GGA 1.4 mMGGA 2.7 mM
A23187 (Pg/ml)anti-IgE (Pg/ml)MCP-1 (nM)H i s t a m i n e r e l e a s e (%)
c H i s t a m i n e r e l e a s e (%) 80604020
e
100806040200
d H i s t a m i n e r e l e a s e (%) 30
20
10
1.4141000.2MCP-1(nM)A23187(Pg/ml)
10anti-IgE (Pg/ml)
PMA
(ng/ml)100Statin (PM) -50
-50
1.4 141.4 1410 100anti-IgE (Pg/ml)
PMA (ng/ml)
10 100515Pretreatment with GGA (min)
Pretreatment with
geranylgeraniol 30(-)1.5 mM
60120b B a s e l i n e h i s t a m i n e r e l e a s e (%)
GGA Modulates Basophil Activation
Allergology International Vol 63, Suppl 1, 2014www.jsaweb.jp !
51
1Division
of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology,
Department of Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine and 2National Hospital Organization Tokyo National Hospital, Tokyo, Japan Email:myama@med.teikyo?u.ac.jp
Conflict of interest:No potential conflict of interest was disclosed.
REFERENCES
1. H, Mukai K, Obata K, Tsujimura Y, Wada T.
Nonredundant roles of basophils in immunity. Annu Rev Immunol 2011; 29:45-69.
2. Ishihara T, Suemasu S, Asasno T, Tanaka K, Mizushima T. Stimulation of gastric ulcer healing by heat shock pro-tein 70. Biochem Pharmacol 2011; 82:728-36.
3. T, Tanaka K, Hoshino T, Azuma A, Mizushima T. Suppression of expression of heat shock protein 70by ge-fitinib and its contribution to pulmonary fibrosis. PLoS One 2011; 6:e27296.
4. Koketsu R, Yamaguchi M, Suzukawa M et al . Pretreat-ment with low levels of Fc εRI-crosslinking stimulation en-hances basophil mediator release. Int Arch Allergy Immu-nol 2013; 161:S23-31.
5. Fujimoto M, Oka T, Murata T, Hori M, Ozaki H. Fluvasta-inhibits mast cell degranulation without changing the cytoplasmic Ca 2+level. Eur J Pharmacol 2009; 602:432-8.6. Majlesi Y, Samorapoompichit P, Hauswirth AW et al . Cerivastatin and atorvastatin inhibit IL-3-dependent differ-entiation and IgE-mediated histamine release in human basophils and downmodulate expression of the basophil-activation antigen CD203c ! E-NPP3. J Leukoc Biol 2003; 73:107-17.
7. Graham TE, Pfeiffer JR, Lee RJ et al . MEK and ERK acti-vation in ras-disabled RBL-2H3mast cells and novel roles for geranylgeranylated and farnesylated proteins in Fc εRI -mediated signaling. J Immunol 1998; 161:6733-44.
8. Endo S, Hiramatsu N, Hayakawa K et al . Geranylgerany-lacetone, an inducer of the 70-kDa heat shock protein (HSP70),elicits unfolded protein response and coordi-nates cellular fate independently of HSP70. Mol Pharma-col 2007; 72:1337-48.
9. Nanke Y, Kawamoto M, Yago T, Chiba J, Yamanaka H, Kotake S. Geranylgeranylacetone, a non-toxic inducer of shock protein, induces cell death in fibroblast-like synoviocytes from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol 2009; 19:379-83.
范文五:嗜碱性粒细胞百分比偏低的平衡方法
嗜碱性粒细胞百分比偏低的平衡方法
我们可能对于嗜碱性粒细胞百分比偏低 还不太了解吧,这是反映我们正常身体机能的一项指标,颈动脉彩超正常值可以详细的客观的反应我们身体某一方面的情况变化,通过对嗜碱性粒细胞百分比的了解,我们可以及时有效的对我们的身体做出调整,补充身体没缺乏的营养物质,如果有疾病就要及时去医院就诊,如何才能平衡嗜碱性粒细胞百分比偏低 呢,下面就让我们一起来了解一下。
治疗方法:
1.如果是感冒会引起嗜酸性粒细胞百分比升高,主要是病毒性感染导致,如果不严重可以多喝水,注意休息,可以痊愈,如果严重可以口服一些中药制剂,如感冒清热颗粒等。 还有大便出血现象是经常性的,还是偶尔的,如果经常性的你先查一下大便情况,一般有痔疮也会导致大便出血,要经常保证大便通畅,避免便秘。
2.嗜酸性粒细胞偏高一般提示有过敏或蛔虫感染等情况,要找出病因彻底治愈病根才能改善嗜酸性粒细胞的比值。如果有的话,可以用抗过敏的药物调节如扑尔敏,或赛庚啶等;或化验大便看是否存在蛔虫感染,有的话打虫治疗如,安乐士,肠虫清等,治愈好原发病的话,嗜酸性粒细胞比值会降至正常。
3治疗使用抗组胺类药物(如氯雷他定片)和维生素C片,钙剂,激素等外,平时的生活饮食卫生和个人卫生也是非常重要的,注意饮食,避免诱因,避免接触花粉,粉尘等。过敏性鼻炎的发病与饮食有—————————————————————————————————————————————————————
一定的关系,某些食物可能是诱因。例如鱼虾海鲜,含有人工色素、防腐剂、酵母菌等人工添加剂的罐头、腌腊食品、饮料等都可诱发,还应忌酸辣。保持健康心态,提高身体抵抗力。
以上内容为我们介绍了如何平衡嗜碱性粒细胞百分比偏低 ,通过以上内容,当我们自身再出现嗜碱性粒细胞百分比偏低 的情况,就可以运用以上的方法进行治疗,就可以免去四处求医问诊的困难,尽快恢复身体健康。
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————
转载请注明出处范文大全网 » 嗜酸性粒细胞和嗜碱性粒细胞计