邢一木册
雅思c7t4小作文,求范文！！
The charts compare the sources of electricity in Australia and France in the years 1980 and 2000. Between these years electricity production almost doubled, rising from 100 units to 170 in Australia, and from 90 to 180 units in France.In 1980 Australia used coal as the main electricity source (50 units) and the remainder was produced from natural gas, hydro power (each producing 20 units) and oil (which produced only 10 units). By 2000, coal had become the fuel for more than 75% of electricity produced and only hydro continued to be another significant source supplying approximately 20%.In contrast, France used coal as a source for only 25 units of electricity in 1980, which was matched by natural gas. The remaining 40 units were produced largely from oil and nuclear power, with hydro contributing only 5 units. But by 2000 nuclear power, which was not used at all Australia, had developed into the main source, producing almost 75% of electricity, at 126 units, while coal and oil together produced only 50 units. Other sources were no longer significant.Overall, it is clear that by 2000 these two countries relied on different principal fuel sources: Australia relied on coal and France on nuclear power.
【剑桥雅思4,TEST1的小作文范文,有一处语法求讲解....
老师们好！我是上海的11年的高考考生，因为觉得作文薄弱所以自己试着写了10年的上海作文题。
写好之后自己感觉还不错，但是似乎缺少一些有文化气息的事例，文笔也不够优美。
。
。
想请各位老师耐着性子看一下（有点长），估计一下大概可以得多少分（满分70），并且指出还有什么地方应该改进的，谢谢！！====================华丽的分割线=======================作文题目：根据以下材料，选取一个角度，自拟题目，写一篇不少于800字的文章（不要写成诗歌）。
丹麦人去钓鱼会随身带一把尺子，钓到鱼，常常用尺子量一量，将不够尺寸的小鱼放回河里。
他们说：“让小鱼长大不更好吗？”两千多年前，我国孟子曾说过：“数罟不入洿池，鱼鳖不可胜食也；”意思是，不要用细密的渔网在池塘里捕捞小鱼，这样才会有更多的鱼。
实际上，其中的道理也贯穿在我们现实生活中的许多方面。
作文全文：“留下余地”的智慧曾经，我总喜欢掐着时间办事：在最后一刻起床、在最后一刻叫作业、在最后一刻写完考场作文…曾经，我为自己这种“精确”洋洋自得。
直到，一次在外地旅游时因为不小心迷路而错过了回家的火车——哎呀当时那真叫叫天天不应叫地地不灵——眼睁睁看着火车开走，我看看空空的钱包只好无奈地打电话向老爸求援，最后耗时费钱不说还误了之后的安排。
从此我开始反思：我是不是办事该给自己留点余地呢？其实，给自己留下余地是一种正确的生活态度。
人在生活中每天都要处理数不清的事情，说不定哪天其中一两件就会因突发因素打乱安排。
如果做事总之做得太绝，不留有一点回旋、应变的余地，不可避免地就会产生问题。
君不见股票交易的广告、信息都会提醒股民：股市有风险，入市需谨慎？就是因为轻易把重金押在某一支股票上，一旦亏损就是万劫不复。
类似的，保健品广告总嘱咐消费者“本品不能替代药物”，也是给自己留下了解释的余地。
可见给自己留下余地就能让我们在处理生活中的事情时都有一条后路，使自己得以更轻松顺畅，不至于一有问题就满盘皆输。
在我给自己试着留下余地之后，我渐渐发现有时做人也需要给别人留下余地。
这是一种对他人的尊重，也是人和人之间能顺畅交往的基石。
就比如说学校里组织一个活动，参与者每个人都有自己的任务。
那么我若是作为一个组织者，当有人忙于其他事情而疏忽工作时我是该硬逼他一定要“按时交货”呢，还是根据他的情况调整计划呢？甚至在有人对我心生不满向我提出意见时，我是该针锋相对大吵一架呢，还是心平静气讨论问题呢？答案不言而喻。
显然，给别人留有余地，其实就体现在包容别人的错误和意见。
退一步才往往是海阔天空，理智、和平的沟通才能发挥效果，让人与人的交流体现出它的价值。
事实上，生活中处处都有“余地”的存在。
我们在给别人留下余地的同时，也在接受别人对我们的“余地”。
甚至往大里说，生活本身乃至“命运”，都会时刻给我们留下回旋的余地。
因此，如何学会利用，进而学会寻找自己的“余地”，就显得很重要了。
犯错后接受别人给予的余地，那就要心存感激的同时努力上进、知错就改，这是知耻而后勇的上进心。
遭遇困难或失败时不放弃，相信自己、相信生命，积极寻找出路或困难的解决办法，那是信念和毅力。
至于如何在找到“余地”后重新开始，最终成功，这又是如何“抓住机遇”的课题了。
可见，“余地”是人生中的一门大智慧，值得我们用心去学习。
关于“余地”的思考，以自身为起点、以他人为路线，最终千千万万个“个人”就绘制成了一幅“余地”的巨幅彩绘，融入到了社会的大环境中，和我们每个人息息相关。
要让自己被“受压迫”的“余地”牵着鼻子走，还是要踩着厚实的“余地”一路前行？至少我已经得出了自己的答案。
问题补充：最主要是想得到估分和改进意见。
。
。
谢谢各位老师了！还有补充下，有没有哪位老师愿意留一下QQ或者网上联系方式？
雅思作文题,求9分范文...
对于二楼，你这绝对不可能是9分的范文，其中必然掺加了很多不必要的点评与细节，在雅思考试中如果出现这种长度超过1000字的大作文，这叫做旷古绝后，首先你不可能在考试时间内写出这种长度的文章，其次考官不会蠢到去看完250字后的内容，再次考试的试纸不可能写出这种长度文章，你把四个词的长度压到一个词，请问考官会相信你写的是英文吗？对于楼主，除非你极有把握你的考试题目就是这个，否则请你立即终止这种毫无意义的发问.与其在一个的题目上求得完美，不如花些心思做些真正有用的事，你应该自己用这个题目练习写一篇拿去给老师看.哪怕是背背模版，记记结构，也比这种获得一个所谓高分的文章有用得多.你记住，满分作文都是考官写的，以此来衡量其它作文，你背了一篇考官写得满分的文章去考试，你觉得考官看了后果会怎样？
求雅思剑桥4-10后面的考官范文+高分范文电子版
楼主，我这里有一篇雅思大作文范文，相信对你有用.雅思作文高分范文：职业专家比明星对社会的贡献大，因此要多收入，同意吗？本文是一篇8分的雅思作文高分范文，文章中有许多的高分句型以及运用的恰到好处的高分词组、词汇，文章的题目是：职业专家比明星对社会的贡献大，因此要多收入，同意吗？现将译文及范文分享给大家，希望对备考雅思的朋友能够有所帮助.中文标题：职业专家比明星对社会的贡献大，因此要多收入，同意吗？译文如下：在当代社会，似乎职业工作这在提高生产力，并给其他人提供直接的服务，而在体育和娱乐方面的名人没有做出此等贡献.因此，有人认为职业工作者应该比明星得到更多的报酬.然而，我不同意他们的意见，原因如下.职业工作者个人对社会的贡献不像名人那么多.任何一个职业工作者不像体育或是娱乐名人那样能够在专业领域给大众带来快乐.并且，同样地，单个职业雇员不能够给国家带来荣耀，也不能提升人们的名族归属感.否则，他们能够做到的话，报酬就不会少.职业工作者（如医生、护士和老师等）的能够使可以被训练和复制的，而明人的天赋是不可以的.一个普通人能够通过受教育和训练去做那些专业的工作，但是，没有那么的人通过受教育和训练能够打篮球打得像姚明一样好，也没有那么多人跳舞能够跳舞跳得想杰克逊那也好.此外，缺少的一个职业专家能被另一人所代替，而缺少一位名人可能会导致某一领域发展的限制.不可否认，由于大量的人们在专业领域工作并且直接服务于大众，他们看起来，至少表面上是与公众的生活水平的提升有着更加亲密的联系.然而，在这个信息时代，当人们更多地关注与精神生活并且能比较单间的获取必要信息时，职业工作者所创造的价值就没有名人所创造的价值高.总之，我不同意职业工作者应该比体育和娱乐名人的工资高的观点.只有当一个人的价值通过其对社会的全面贡献来衡量的时候，社会每个领域才能得到全面的发展.本文源自雅思救星.英文标题：Professional workers like doctors,nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities.To what extent do you agree or disagree？范文如下：It seems that,in this society,professional workers are improving the productivity and providing direct service to others,while celebrities in sports and entertainment are not making such contributions.Therefore,some people claim a higher pay for the former over the latter.However,I would show my disagreement to their statement for the following reasons.Professional workers do not contribute so much to society as celebrities in person.Any single worker in the professional field is not able to bring the happiness to such a large population as a famous person in sports or entertainment does.Also,an individual professional employee cannot similarly bring glories to the country and enhance people's sense of belongings to the nation.Otherwise,if they can,their payment will not be less.Unlike the talents in celebrities that are invaluable,the abilities of professional workers,such as doctors,nurses and teachers can be trained and copied.An ordinary person can be educated or trained to be engaged in those professional jobs,but not so many can be taught to play basketball so well as Yaomin and dance so gracefully as Jackson.Besides,the lack of a professional worker can be soon replaced by another one,while the loss of a celebrity may result in the limit of development in a certain field.Admittedly,due to the large population of people working in professional fields and the direct service people receive from them,they may seem,at least superficially,be more closely related to the improvement of the life level of the public.However,in this information age when people are attaching more importance to their spiritual life and easier in obtaining information needed,the value produced by professional workers is not so high as that brought by the celebrities.To sum up,I do not agree with the idea for professional workers to earn a higher salary than the sports and entertainment personalities.Only when a man's value is measured by his overall contribution to society,can every field in the world be developed to its full.
求2006年4月22日,雅思大作文范文
People live in the present. They plan for and worry about the future. History, however, is the study of the past. Some people might ask, ＂Given all the demands that press in from living in the present and anticipating what is yet to come, why bother with what has been? Given all the desirable and available branches of knowledge, why insist—as most American educational programs do—on a good bit of history? And why urge many students to study even more history than they are required to?＂ However, it's undeniable that learning about past has its value, it will help us understand people and societies, and it will help us understand change and how the society we live in came to be.History helps us understand people and societies. In the first place, history offers a storehouse of information about how people and societies behave. Understanding the operations of people and societies is difficult, though a number of disciplines make the attempt. An exclusive reliance on current data would needlessly handicap our efforts. For example, how can we evaluate war if the nation is at peace—unless we use historical materials? How can we understand genius, the influence of technological innovation, or the role that beliefs play in shaping family life, if we don't use what we know about experiences in the past? Consequently, history must serve, however imperfectly, as our laboratory, and data from the past must serve as our most vital evidence in the unavoidable quest to figure out why our complex species behaves as it does in societal settings. This, fundamentally, is why we cannot stay away from history: it offers the only extensive evidential base for the contemplation and analysis of how societies function, and people need to have some sense of how societies function simply to run their own lives.History also helps us understand change and how the society we live in came to be. The second reason history is inescapable as a subject of serious study follows closely on the first. The past causes the present, and so the future. Any time we try to know why something happened—whether a shift in political party dominance in the American Congress, a major change in the teenage suicide rate, or a war in the Balkans or the Middle East—we have to look for factors that took shape earlier. Sometimes fairly recent history will suffice to explain a major development, but often we need to look further back to identify the causes of change. Only through studying history can we grasp how things change; only through history can we begin to comprehend the factors that cause change; and only through history can we understand what elements of an institution or a society persist despite change.
