真是什么领域的人有什么样的看法，

BFT 可以是什么多缩写，看你什么行业里用。有多一点信息没有

ACT写作新旧范文比较

ACT Essay于2015年9月份改革到现在已经十个月左右时间。细心的同学们发现，官网满分（6分）的范文却换了模样。笔者根据ACT essay的评分标准（4 domains）对前后两篇文章做了比较。

1.Ideas and Analysis

新版范文的论点跟所给的三个观点不相同，用三个主体段分别讨论三个所给的观点；原版范文的论点基本上暗合观点1（Perspective 1）。相同之处是：论点准确，鲜明，并且同时涉及题目所给观点。

2.Development and Support

在发展和支撑论点上，新范文中并没有采用学术化的例子，有意模糊论据的学术性。但是两篇范文都采用了严密的逻辑和例证去发展观点，这就要求同学们必须提高自己的逻辑思维和论证能力。

3.Organization

在文章组织上，新范文回避了对于题目所给观点的指向（References to given perspectives)，即在主体段没有提到暗合哪一个观点（in agreement with Perspective 1,2,3）。此外新范文由一个controlling idea 连接主体段落，探究机器在不同领域造成的影响，而旧文章探究机器导致的正面和反面的影响。相同之处在于，使用有效的过渡（Transitions）按逻辑的渐进性（progression）发展论点。

4.Language Use

在语言应用方面，两篇范文在措辞和句式上都展现了深厚的语言功底。原版范文学术化，文体正式，很有说服力。新范文体现了鲜明的风格和特色，比如使用重复(repetition)等修辞增强说服力。

综上所述，虽然新范文从细则上更贴合评分标准，但是原版范文同样不可忽视。考生必须要按着评分标准细则去准备ACT Essay，同时提高思维论证能力和语言能力，不断提高自己的写作水平。

接下来，笔者就两篇文章的首段稍作分析：

（原范文）As technology improves, and more and more tasks are completed by machines instead of humans, the question is no longer about what we can do with machines, but rather what we should. Although the usage of machines increases efficiency and our standard of living, it detracts from the value of human life.

（新范文）Advances in technology have become so widely accepted in today’s culture that very few people are willing to pause to consider the consequences. People get so excited about what new technologies can offer that they forget to question whether there might be any negative effects. Without caution and deliberation, replacing the natural with the mechanical would undoubtedly be disastrous.

原范文中的“tasks are completed by machines instead of humans”和“increase efficiency and our standard of living”暗合观点2，本文论点“detracts from the value of human life”暗合观点1，但却没有提到观点3。

而新范文中 “what new technologies can offer”以及“negative effects”分别暗合观点2，3和1。

通过对比，我们不难发现新范文的首段更贴近评分标准中的engage with multiple perspectives，并且在段子最后提出了新的观点。这是对考生方向性的提示。

对新范文详细和科学的分析，让我们更加了解考试的动向和要求。方向比努力重要，找准方向，精确备考，不走冤枉路，才能事半功倍。

ACT官网新范文（6分）及解析

Advances in technology have become so widely accepted in today’s culture that very few people are willing to pause to consider the consequences. People get so excited about what new technologies can offer that they forget to question whether there might be any negative effects. Without caution and deliberation, replacing the natural with the mechanical would undoubtedly be disastrous.

The economic implications of the potential mechanical takeover alone should be enough to dissuade anyone from moving too fast. In the event the robots are more widely used in the workplace, humans would surely be replaced. At first, businesses would benefit from the efficiency of robots, but eventually a depressed job market would lead to a population that struggles just to feed themselves and their families, let alone purchase the products these robots make. In the long run, society will suffer if it does not take care to prevent the economic consequences of giving everything over to machines.

Our careless use of automation has already taken a toll on our culture. People have been interacting with automation in nearly every aspect of their lives, whether it be shopping, banking, or the use of a telephone. The effect of this is obvious: basic respect for our fellow man is all but absent today because of increased interaction with automation. Why treat a machine with kindness? It suffers no emotional or psychological damage. In a culture saturated with automation, we get used to treating machines rudely, and we begin to treat each other rudely. This of course leads to all sorts of issues, like intolerence and incivility, and in the long run, results in the complete degradation of culture.

Even in the face of these obstacles, some people argue that the increasing intelligence of today’s machines is a good thing. After all, machine power can decrease the human work load. Computer processers double in power and ability every year. Computers are projected to reach human intelligence by as soon as 2025. The implications of this shift are unknown, but one thing is for certain. We are moving into this change too fast to anticipate and prevent damage to the human species. We are approaching this change too quickly for any sort of safety net to be built. Because of this, it is important that we as a species slow down our technological development so that we might consider all the implications of a change this big. We must figure out how to handle negative societal and cultural consequences before we embrace total integration of automated, intelligent machines.

Decreasing the speed with which we incorporate mechanical influence is important because of the potential dangers that lurk in blind acceptance. Not only does the preference of the mechanical over the natural interfere with the job market and the economy, but its use also has the potential to seriously degrade our culture as a whole. In combination with the uncertainty surrounding the increasing intelligence of machines, it is most assuredly better for the human species that technological progress be slowed so that we can, if necessary, prevent additional damage.

Score Explanation - Score 6

Ideas and Analysis = 6

By framing the issue as a matter of reckless technological abandon, the writer establishes an insightful context for analysis of the issue and its perspectives. This context informs a nuanced, precise thesis: Though we are inclined to welcome technological advancement with open arms, “the potential dangers that lurk in blind acceptance” necessitate “caution and deliberation” as we determine how to make use of intelligent machines. In advancing this thesis, the writer examines the economic and cultural implications of moving too quickly into the age of automation. In doing so, the writer has generated an argument that critically engages with multiple perspectives on this issue.

Development and Support = 6

An integrated line of reasoning and illustration effectively conveys the argument’s significance by exploring the economic and cultural implications of the mindless incorporation of intelligent machines. Hypothetical examples (In the event the robots are more widely used in the workplace) and skillful reasoning (The implications of this shift are unknown, but one thing is for certain. We are moving into this change too fast to anticipate and prevent damage to the human species) develop and support the thesis by drawing out and making persuasive its meaning and importance. The final body paragraph complicates the argument by conceding both the benefits of machine power and the unprecedented sophistication of modern technologies, using these concessions to reinforce the call for moderation and deliberation—as we reach new technological heights, it is even more important that we “figure out how to handle” potential unintended consequences.

Organization = 6

As with its development and support, a persistent focus on exploring the thesis benefits the organization of this response. This skillful strategy is driven by its controlling idea, which shapes the argument as it progresses logically from a discussion of future economic implications to a treatment of present-day cultural conditions to an examination of opposing viewpoints. Effective transitions between paragraphs reflect this organizing principle (The economic implications of the potential mechanical takeover; Our careless use of automation has already taken a toll on our culture; Even in the face of these obstacles, some people argue that the increasing intelligence of today’s machines is a good thing), while transitions within paragraphs serve to clarify and strengthen the writer’s reasoning (At first, but eventually, This of course, After all). All told, this strategy increases the effectiveness of the argument.

Language Use = 6

Precise vocabulary (societal and cultural consequences, intolerence and incivility, emotional or psychological damage) and a variety of clear sentence structures reflect advanced skill in the use of language. So too does the prose itself, which is largely free of errors. Of particular note are the writer’s strategic stylistic choices. Words like degrade, depressed, and damagework to establish a sense of alarm or dread, which underscores the writer’s call for consideration of the potential consequences she perceives. In the final body paragraph, the writer uses repetitive sentence constructions (We are, We are, We must) as the argument moves into its call for action. These rhetorical flourishes work to clarify the thesis and make persuasive its implications, thus enhancing the argument.

ACT官网原版范文（6分）及解析

As technology improves, and more and more tasks are completed by machines instead of humans, the question is no longer about what we can do with machines, but rather what we should. Although the usage of machines increases efficiency and our standard of living, it detracts from the value of human life.

As machines increasingly perform all our basic tasks, society is able to produce more. The additional production adds material value to our society and frees people up from these low-skill tasks. This is in agreement with Perspective Two which claims that this industrialization leads to more prosperity. For example, in the 18th century, short-staple cotton that was grown in the Southern United States required an immense amount of labor in order to seperate the seeds from the fiber to process the cotton to make it marketable. However, in the mid-19th century, Eli Whitney, an American entrepreneur, invented the cotton gin, which allowed for automation of cotton processing. This machine replaced the need of a large work force for the process and greatly improved production. As a result of the cotton gin, short-staple cotton production skyrocketed, increasing by more than 10 times in the South while bringing prosperity to the region and setting in motion a new industrial era in America. This is in agreement with Perspective Three, which says that mechanization allows for “unimagined possibilities”. Although there are clearly many advantages to industrialization, there are also some heavy drawbacks.

The replacement of humans by machines leads to the loss of value to human life, an effect that outweighs the material gains of automation. The search to find human tasks that can be performed by machines inevitably leads to comparisons between the human and the machine. If a company executive wants to see if a inventory management team can be replaced by a robotic system, he will compare the two and determine which can do a better job. When this occurs, the people on the team are evaluated not for their worth as human beings, but for their effectiveness at performing a specific function—in essence, as we would evaluate a machine. In a larger sense, when we begin to think about humans in this way, the worth of a person’s life becomes dependent on only what they can do and no longer has any intrinsic value. As Perspective One states, we begin to lose our humanity. This new mindset and way of evaluating people, though seemingly harmless in the workplace, is devastating when it begins to pervade a society. If a person is judged only on his or her capability, there is no reason for a person to remain after they have served their function. This would warrant genocide against the elderly and the disabled because their burden on society would not be made up for by any production. Although the machines may seem to only fulfill the low skill jobs at the moment, there is no barrier to prevent the machines from replacing more. As the machines increase in intelligence, they will replace any tasks done by humans and render us unnecessary and worthless.

Due to the risks of dehumanization, the material benefits of machines are not enough to justify its increasing presence.

Scoring Explanation

Ideas and Analysis = 6

The writer generates an argument that engages critically with multiple perspectives. A nuanced, precise thesis—efficiency afforded by intelligent machines is ultimately detrimental to a society and to the human race more generally—propels the argument. In analyzing the issue and its perspectives, the argument employs a number of insightful contexts, juxtaposing the historical against the contemporary and framing a number of ethical and abstract tensions (prosperity and efficiency devalue human life; material benefits carry intangible costs). Against these conceptual backdrops, the writer examines the positive and negative effects of the increasing presence of intelligent machines, along with the implications and complexities of the given perspectives.

Development and Support = 6

The example of the cotton gin is simple yet effective at illustrating the writer’s concession that machines have indeed contributed to the greater financial good. Elsewhere, development is oriented toward reasoning rather than driven by example. The second body paragraph uses the concept of genocide, rather than a specific example of it, to refine and support the idea that comparisons between human and machine, even in the name of prosperity, reduce and devalue human qualities and pose a great danger to society. As the argument pushes forward, critical contexts broaden—the tension is heightened when we must weigh the established benefits of mechanization, as seen through history, against the risks of a future dominated by machines—and allow for deeper insight. All told, this integrated line of reasoning and illustration effectively conveys the meaning and import of the argument.

Organization = 6

This response is unified by a clear purpose. The logic of the argument is immediately apparent—this writer’s strategy is based on a framework of juxtaposition, one that sets out and explores two competing values in tension. This straightforward strategy allows for a logical progression of ideas, which is realized due in part to effective transitions that lead the reader to the writer’s conclusions. Examples, explanations, and references to the given perspectives are skillfully interwoven, allowing for the argument to advance even as its scope expands.

Language Use = 6

Conveying nuanced ideas, marshalling evidence for those ideas, establishing logical relationships—all these skills rely on the use of language. In this response, use of language is superior. Effective diction works in concert with varied syntax to relay complex notions with clarity. The writer establishes a formal, academic voice tone that is occasionally manipulated to persuasive effect—as the writer discusses the perceived dehumanizing effects of machines, her language conveys an increasing sense of alarm (devastating, render us unnecessary and worthless). In all, the command over language on display in this response enhances the argument and earns the highest possible score in this domain

英语四级作文范文

This picture portrays such an ironic situation: on the road, stands a man, who is completely concentrating on his cell phone whereas using a stick for direction, which implies the unprecedented popularity or even overusing of cell phones nowadays.Exaggerated as the picture is , the phenomenon behind it is rather thought-procking. With the development of high-tech equipment, especially smart phones, people in growing numbers tend to become addicted to the excessive use of them. According to a survey carried out in China Daily several days ago, almost 47% of citizens explain that they would experience certain kind of anxiety without cellphones at hand. Meanwhile, the overusing of cellphones, firstly, would exert detrimental impact on the health of us. What's worse, it would perform a negative character in interpersonal relationship since we have less time to communicate.Judging from the evidence above, certain measures should be taken. Firstly, certain institutions in China should launch relevant campaigns to limit the excessive ust of cellphones. Moreover, we ,as college students, should put emphasis on it right from ourselves as a start.这幅画描绘了这样一个具有讽刺意味的情况：在道路上，站着一个男人，谁是完全集中在他的手机而用棒的方向，这意味着前所未有的人气甚至过度使用手机现在。

夸张的画面，它背后的现象，而思想procking。

随着高新技术设备的发展，特别是智能手机的普及，越来越多的人们往往沉溺于他们过度使用。

据调查，在中国日报前几天进行的，几乎47%的人解释他们会经历某种焦虑没有手机在手。

同时，手机的使用，首先，将对我们的健康有害的影响。

更糟的是，它将执行一个消极的人在人际关系因为我们交流时间少了。

从上面的证据来看，应采取一定的措施。

首先，在中国某些机构应开展相关的活动限制手机的过度乌斯。

此外，我们，作为大学生，应该把重点放在对自己作为一个开始。

tpo独立写作范文,如何达到tpo独立写作范文的标准

其二，逻辑清晰，论据具体。

tpo独立写作范文要求展开充分。

要求我们在保持平衡的基础上有所侧重。

论述一个问题，一定要做到在某些方面有所倾向，但是对其他的观点也要稍微着些笔墨。

在论述时，需要具体合适的例子作为论据，来支持论点。

例子不在于多少，而在于是否贴切，不要生搬硬套。

其四，语言。

tpo独立写作范文的语言需要达到准确、流畅、丰富三个基本标准。

准确要求在拼写、语法、用词上没有错误，以及一些搭配要准确，这是基本的。

流畅则是读起来要顺口，行文一气呵成使得逻辑清晰。

语言的丰富体现了考生的语言能力，注意用词的时候尽量避免重复。

一些修辞手法的运用更能体现语言的丰富。

一篇标准的tpo独立写作范文主要做到以上几点就可以了。

相信这样的分析能对广大考生有所帮助。

雅思写作范文

—、书信写作要求书信（Letter）一般可分为事务信件或公函（Business Letter or Offical Correspondence）以及私人信件（Private Letter）两大类。

一般包括以下几个要点：1） 收信人的姓名和地址；2） 寄信人的姓名及其与收信人的关系；3） 寄信人的地址（有时可以省略）；4） 写信的时间；5） 信的内容。

1. 书信的格式1） 信头（Heading）;2） 称呼（Salutation）;3） 正文（Body of the letter）;4） 结束语（Complimentary close）;5） 签名（signature）。

2. 书信的种类1） 邀请信邀请信有正式和非正式之分，也有介于两者之间者。

正式邀请信一般属于公函类，私人邀请信一般属于非正式文体。

邀请朋友、熟人参加某一聚会时，再词句上不一定多加斟酌，用词太正规倒显得关系不密切。

但是如果与被邀请人不太熟悉的话，最好用正式文体。

如虽认识但并不十分了解，文体可介于两个者之间。

由此可见，私人邀请究竟用什么文体，关键看与被邀请人之间的亲疏的程度。

邀请信要明确写出活动（是晚会、晚餐还是一般的聚会等）、活动的时间地点组织这项活动的理由，有时还应告诉对方可能出席的人，另外一般希望对方给予答复。

（1） 非正式邀请信，如；26 Coventry St.LondonSept. 15th, 1999.Dear Jack,I am going to the cinema to see the Red River Valley and I have two tickets. Would you like to come? The film starts at 7:30 p.m. Maybe we can meet at the Covent Garden Station at 7:00 p.m. and have a drink before the film starts. Please phone me at home to let me know.Looking forward to seeing you.Love Mary这封信是写给朋友的，所以用语比较随便，比较口语化。

（2） 正式邀请信，如：Dear Ms. Gupta;It's our great pleasure to announce that Jan. 19th is the 3rd anniversary of the founding of our corporation. We have a small party as follows: 7:00p.m.,Jan. 19th, Room No.123, Kunlun Hotel. At this moment, we would like to express our sincere gratitude to our clients for both courtesy and support over the past three years. Please confirm if you plant to attend. Yours Sincerely, Lewis这是一封正式邀请信，十分正规，无论从句式，还是用语都十分讲究。

（3） 介于正式和非正式之间的邀请信，如：No.4 Middle SchoolBeijing 100034April 29th,2000Dear Miss Katherine,I am very pleased to write to you. My name is Yu Hong and I am monitor of Class One, Grade Three of the No.2 Middle School of Ji'nan. Last year, you came here to give a speech, which was ＂Fast Reading＂. My classmates and I all thank you very much. We will have an English evening at 7:00--9:00 on the evening of May 4th in our classroom. Would you please come and attend the evening party? At the party, we will sing English songs, play games and so on. And we are anxious to invite you to come to sing us an English song. After that we can enjoy the music. We hope to see you soon.YoursYu Hong这封信是写给一位外籍教师的，这位外籍教师曾经到过这所学校，虽然作者认识，但并不十分了解。

2）感谢信 感谢信可分为感谢馈赠、感谢款待、感谢帮助、感谢送行和感谢探病等。

感谢信一般包括以下几点：①对收信人的称谓；②写信的目的；（Thank you for…）③致谢并详述所收到的礼物或得到的帮助等；④结尾及谦称。

如：Dear Ms. Gupta:How regretful I must leave you house. Thank you for the many good things you provided. The chess game, tennis match and Mr. Gupta's delicious dishes gave me lots of enjoyment. If you came to Beijing for any reason, please come to my family. The kids are looking forward to seeing Aunt Jean. I believe we will have a very happy time. Yours Sincerely, Lewis3）求职信求职信属于公务信函，格式和用词比较规。

信的内容大体上分为三部分①写信的目的， ②自我介绍，③要求。

注意下面几点：①写信的目的要直截了当地在信的开头提出。

②自我介绍部分主要介绍自己的学历、工作经历、解决问题的能力等等。

在行文、用词上要表现出自信、恳切的态度，语言简明扼要，突出介绍自己的优点，与众不同的特长或有利条件。

还要紧扣用人单位的需求，巧用词语，有国地说服对方，此职非你莫属。

③最后提出进一步联系的途径，如：时间、地点。

还可以主动提出接受面试或考核等。

④求职信在写作特点上主要用第一人称以及动词的一般现在时。

如：Ms Li Ling P.O.Box 231Beijing July 10,1999Dear sir(s),I have just read in the newspaper that a secretary of the English language in wanted in your company. I am therefore writing to you to introduce myself. I'd like to get the job. I am a girl college student of 22 years old. My name is Li Ling. I am studying in the language department. I can speak, read and write English very well. As a second language, I can read and speak a little French. I have some work experience as a typist in my spare time at school, and as a tourist guide during summer holidays. The bosses I worked for were ...

哪些国外网站有托福写作范文 知乎

GOOD HEALTH 良好的健康 We all wish (hope) to be happy, so we should take good care of our health. Health is the best treasure (which) a man can possess. Money can do many things, but it cannot buy happiness. However, so long as a man has good health, he can enjoy the pleasures of human life. In order to insure good health we must pay attention to three things. They are nourishing food, fresh air and proper exercise. 我们大家都希望快乐，所以我们应该好好保重健康。

一个病人因为失去健康而很少快乐。

健康是一个人所能拥有最好的财富。

钱能做许多事情，但是它却不能购买。

然而，只要一个人有良好的健康，他就能享受人生的乐趣。

为了保证良好的健康，我们必须注意三件事情。

它们是营养食物，新鲜空气和正当运动

高考英语作文范文！急！！！

Some people think that success is doing something that you want to do.Some even deny the existence of success,he thinks this world is not successful,only the endless pursuit.So I want to make a new definition of success:Success is something that people are very eager to do good things gained a sense of satisfaction and excitement.Therefore,we do things,no matter big and small,as long as you want to do,and through your efforts made,and you happy,then you succeeded.Do not look too far successful,they should not be too easy to see success,success requires your effort.Those who believe that successful people do not exist,in fact,continue to define new goals

张大师材料作文范文

挡，却被大师阻止。

“前门不必挡，但是快把后门打开。

”果然那山洪由前门进，在院子里打个转，又由后门流了出去。

院子里虽然有水，但只是流过，始终没有积深。

台风过去了，家人前来报告：“房子里只溅进了一点点水，古董字画毫无损失，唯有几卷立在门边的宣纸浸上了水渍。

”“把宣纸摊在地上，并用水将整张纸喷湿。

”张大师又下了一道令人不解的指示。

家人照办，那宣纸被喷湿，风干之后，原先的水渍居然全然不见，再经电熨斗一烫，简直平整如新。

英语小作文 范文

(1)I wonder what the wind is saying.I wonder where the cloud is.I wonder why it rains.I wonder what's in the sea.I wonder how the birds fly.I wonder how the fish breathe.I wonder how the flowers grow.I wonder why the world is so wizardly.. (2)What shall we do next Sunday? Next Sunday we shall get up very early. My father and I shall wash and dress quickly and have a small breakfast. Then we shall take our bags. There will be bread and butter, meat and some other things to eat, and cold water to drink. We shall go to the woods for a walk. Mother won't go with us. She will stay at home with my little sister. We shall walk in the woods, swim in the river, pick flowers for Mother. We shall have dinner in the woods and come back home in the evening. (3)What will it be like in 2050? Tom and Fred are talking about the year 2050. ＂What will the world be like in the year 2050?＂ asks Tom. ＂I don't know.＂ Says Fred, ＂What do you think?＂ ＂Well, no one knows. But it is interesting to guess.＂ Says Tom. ＂In the year 2050 everyone will carry a pocket computer. The computer will give people the answers to all their problems. We shall have telephones in our pockets, too. And we can talk to our friends all over the world. Perhaps we will work only two or three days a week, we can fly to the moon by spaceship and spend holidays there.＂ ＂I'm very glad to hear that, I hope to fly to the moon. And I hope to live in the sea.＂ Says Fred ＂Won't that be interesting? Just like a fish.＂ (4)Do you like rain? It is eight o'clock on a Monday morning and it is raining. A cold wind is blowing, and the sky is gray. Men and women are going to work. Some are walking, some are riding on buses, some are waiting for buses on windy corners in the rain. Others are driving their cars, or riding in the cars of neighbors and friends. The city streets are full of cars and buses. All are moving slowly, one after another, along the city streets and on the roads between cities and town. Children are going to school. Some are riding on school buses, some are riding in their parents cars. Many are walking, and they are not very happy. Life is not beautiful on a rainy Monday morning.(5) Why should I study? A stupid pupil said to his parents, ＂The more I study, the more I know. The more I know, the more I forget. The less I know, the less I forget. Nothing I know, nothing I forget. So why should I study?＂

转载请注明出处范文大全网 » BFT 的英文全写是什么